Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
Microbiol Spectr ; : e0022524, 2024 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687067

RESUMO

The detection of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) relies on testing the stool of patients by toxin antigen detection or PCR methods. Although PCR and antigenic methods have significantly reduced the time to results, delays in stool collection can significantly add to the turnaround time. The use of rectal swabs to detect C. difficile could considerably reduce the time to diagnosis of CDI. We developed a new rapid PCR assay for the detection of C. difficile and evaluated this PCR assay on both stool and rectal swab specimens. We recruited a total of 623 patients suspected of C. difficile infection. Stool samples and rectal swabs were collected from each patient and tested by our PCR assay. Stool samples were also tested by the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA) as a reference. The PCR assay detected C. difficile in 60 stool specimens and 61 rectal swabs for the 64 patients whose stool samples were positive for C. difficile by CCNA. The PCR assay detected an additional 35 and 36 stool and rectal swab specimens positive for C. difficile, respectively, for sensitivity with stools and rectal swabs of 93.8% and 95.3%, specificity of 93.7% and 93.6%, positive predictive values of 63.2% and 62.9%, and negative predictive values of 99.2% and 99.4%. Detection of C. difficile using PCR on stools or rectal swabs yielded reliable and similar results. The use of PCR tests on rectal swabs could reduce turnaround time for CDI detection, thus improving CDI management and control of C. difficile transmission. IMPORTANCE: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea, resulting in high morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. In clinical laboratories, CDI testing is currently performed on stool samples collected from patients with diarrhea. However, the diagnosis of CDI can be delayed by the time required to collect stool samples. Barriers to sample collection could be overcome by using a rectal swab instead of a stool sample. Our study showed that CDI can be identified rapidly and reliably by a new PCR assay developed in our laboratory on both stool and rectal swab specimens. The use of PCR tests on rectal swabs could reduce the time for the detection of CDI and improve the management of this infection. It should also provide a useful alternative for infection-control practitioners to better control the spread of C. difficile.

2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(11): 1558-1564, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35249564

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program conducted point-prevalence surveys in acute-care hospitals in 2002, 2009, and 2017 to identify trends in antimicrobial use. METHODS: Eligible inpatients were identified from a 24-hour period in February of each survey year. Patients were eligible (1) if they were admitted for ≥48 hours or (2) if they had been admitted to the hospital within a month. Chart reviews were conducted. We calculated the prevalence of antimicrobial use as follows: patients receiving ≥1 antimicrobial during survey period per number of patients surveyed × 100%. RESULTS: In each survey, 28-47 hospitals participated. In 2002, 2,460 (36.5%; 95% CI, 35.3%-37.6%) of 6,747 surveyed patients received ≥1 antimicrobial. In 2009, 3,566 (40.1%, 95% CI, 39.0%-41.1%) of 8,902 patients received ≥1 antimicrobial. In 2017, 3,936 (39.6%, 95% CI, 38.7%-40.6%) of 9,929 patients received ≥1 antimicrobial. Among patients who received ≥1 antimicrobial, penicillin use increased 36.8% between 2002 and 2017, and third-generation cephalosporin use increased from 13.9% to 18.1% (P < .0001). Between 2002 and 2017, fluoroquinolone use decreased from 25.7% to 16.3% (P < .0001) and clindamycin use decreased from 25.7% to 16.3% (P < .0001) among patients who received ≥1 antimicrobial. Aminoglycoside use decreased from 8.8% to 2.4% (P < .0001) and metronidazole use decreased from 18.1% to 9.4% (P < .0001). Carbapenem use increased from 3.9% in 2002 to 6.1% in 2009 (P < .0001) and increased by 4.8% between 2009 and 2017 (P = .60). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of antimicrobial use increased between 2002 and 2009 and then stabilized between 2009 and 2017. These data provide important information for antimicrobial stewardship programs.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Infecção Hospitalar , Humanos , Prevalência , Canadá/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Hospitais , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
CMAJ Open ; 10(1): E74-E81, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35105684

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, a substantial number of Quebec hospitals were hit by hospital-acquired (HA) SARS-CoV-2 infections. Our objective was to assess whether mortality is higher in HA cases than in non-hospital-acquired (NHA) cases and determine the prevalence of HA-SARS-CoV-2 infection in our hospital. METHODS: This retrospective single-centre cohort study included all adults (≥ 18 yr) who had COVID-19, admitted to Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (Montréal, Canada) from Mar. 1 to June 30, 2020. We collected data on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, treatment, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanical ventilation requirements from electronic health records. We adjudicated hospital acquisition based on the timing of symptom onset, and polymerase chain reaction testing for and exposures to SARS-CoV-2. To evaluate the association between HA-SARS-CoV-2 infection and in-hospital mortality, we computed a multivariable logistic regression analysis including known risk factors for death in patients with COVID-19 as covariates. RESULTS: Among 697 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 253 (36.3%) were classified as HA. The mortality rate was higher in the HA group than in the NHA group (38.2% v. 26.4%, p = 0.001), while the rates of ICU admission (8.3% v. 19.1%, p = 0.001) and requirement for mechanical ventilation (3.6% v. 13.0%, p = 0.001) were lower. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that HA-SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients younger than 75 years is an independent risk factor for death (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.44-5.38). INTERPRETATION: Our results show that HA-SARS-CoV-2 infection in younger patients was associated with higher mortality. Future studies need to evaluate relevant patient-centred long-term outcomes in this population.


Assuntos
COVID-19/mortalidade , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/virologia , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , RNA Viral/isolamento & purificação , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Med Virol ; 94(3): 985-993, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34672374

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to validate the use of spring water gargle (SWG) as an alternative to oral and nasopharyngeal swab (ONPS) for SARS-CoV-2 detection with a laboratory-developed test. Healthcare workers and adults from the general population, presenting to one of two COVID-19 screening clinics in Montréal and Québec City, were prospectively recruited to provide a gargle sample in addition to the standard ONPS. The paired specimens were analyzed using thermal lysis followed by a laboratory-developed nucleic acid amplification test (LD-NAAT) to detect SARS-CoV-2, and comparative performance analysis was performed. An individual was considered infected if a positive result was obtained on either sample. A total of 1297 adult participants were recruited. Invalid results (n = 18) were excluded from the analysis. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 144/1279 (11.3%) participants: 126 from both samples, 15 only from ONPS, and 3 only from SWG. Overall, the sensitivity was 97.9% (95% CI: 93.7-99.3) for ONPS and 89.6% (95% CI: 83.4-93.6; p = 0.005) for SWG. The mean ONPS cycle threshold (Ct ) value was significantly lower for the concordant paired samples as compared to discordant ones (22.9 vs. 32.1; p < 0.001). In conclusion, using an LD-NAAT with thermal lysis, SWG is a less sensitive sampling method than the ONPS. However, the higher acceptability of SWG might enable a higher rate of detection from a population-based perspective. Nonetheless, in patients with a high clinical suspicion of COVID-19, a repeated analysis with ONPS should be considered. The sensitivity of SWG using NAAT preceded by chemical extraction should be evaluated.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Nascentes Naturais , Adulto , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Humanos , Antissépticos Bucais , Nasofaringe , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Saliva , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Água
5.
CMAJ ; 193(49): E1868-E1877, 2021 12 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34903591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected health care workers. We sought to estimate SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among hospital health care workers in Quebec, Canada, after the first wave of the pandemic and to explore factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. METHODS: Between July 6 and Sept. 24, 2020, we enrolled health care workers from 10 hospitals, including 8 from a region with a high incidence of COVID-19 (the Montréal area) and 2 from low-incidence regions of Quebec. Eligible health care workers were physicians, nurses, orderlies and cleaning staff working in 4 types of care units (emergency department, intensive care unit, COVID-19 inpatient unit and non-COVID-19 inpatient unit). Participants completed a questionnaire and underwent SARS-CoV-2 serology testing. We identified factors independently associated with higher seroprevalence. RESULTS: Among 2056 enrolled health care workers, 241 (11.7%) had positive SARS-CoV-2 serology. Of these, 171 (71.0%) had been previously diagnosed with COVID-19. Seroprevalence varied among hospitals, from 2.4% to 3.7% in low-incidence regions to 17.9% to 32.0% in hospitals with outbreaks involving 5 or more health care workers. Higher seroprevalence was associated with working in a hospital where outbreaks occurred (adjusted prevalence ratio 4.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.63-6.57), being a nurse or nursing assistant (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.34, 95% CI 1.03-1.74) or an orderly (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.49, 95% CI 1.12-1.97), and Black or Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.41, 95% CI 1.13-1.76). Lower seroprevalence was associated with working in the intensive care unit (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.71) or the emergency department (adjusted prevalence ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.98). INTERPRETATION: Health care workers in Quebec hospitals were at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in outbreak settings. More work is needed to better understand SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in health care settings.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/sangue , COVID-19/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Demografia , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais , Humanos , Incidência , Doenças Profissionais/sangue , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Pandemias , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
J Med Virol ; 93(12): 6837-6840, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34324212

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gargle samples have been proposed as a noninvasive method for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The clinical performance of gargle specimens diluted in Cobas® PCR Media and in Cobas® Omni Lysis Reagent was compared to oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab (ONPS) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. STUDY DESIGN: Participants were recruited prospectively in two COVID-19 screening clinics. In addition to the ONPS, participants gargled with 5 ml of natural spring water split in the laboratory as follows: 1 ml was added to 4.3 ml of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) media and 400 µl was added to 200 µl of lysis buffer. Testing was performed with the Cobas® SARS-CoV-2 test on the Cobas® 6800 or 8800 platforms. RESULTS: Overall, 134/647 (20.7%) participants were considered infected because the ONPS or at least one gargle test was positive. ONPS had, respectively, a sensitivity of 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.3-98.5); both gargle processing methods were slightly less but equally sensitive (90.3% [95% CI: 83.9-94.3]). When ONPS and gargle specimens were both positive, the mean cycle threshold (Ct ) was significantly higher for gargles, suggesting lower viral loads. CONCLUSION: Gargle specimens directly added in PCR Media provide a similar clinical sensitivity to chemical lysis, both having a slightly, not significantly, lower sensitivity to ONPS.


Assuntos
Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/virologia , Nasofaringe/virologia , Orofaringe/virologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Viral/genética , Saliva/virologia , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Carga Viral/genética
7.
Lancet Respir Med ; 9(8): 924-932, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34051877

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests a role for excessive inflammation in COVID-19 complications. Colchicine is an oral anti-inflammatory medication beneficial in gout, pericarditis, and coronary disease. We aimed to investigate the effect of colchicine on the composite of COVID-19-related death or hospital admission. METHODS: The present study is a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, adaptive, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. The study was done in Brazil, Canada, Greece, South Africa, Spain, and the USA, and was led by the Montreal Heart Institute. Patients with COVID-19 diagnosed by PCR testing or clinical criteria who were not being treated in hospital were eligible if they were at least 40 years old and had at least one high-risk characteristic. The randomisation list was computer-generated by an unmasked biostatistician, and masked randomisation was centralised and done electronically through an automated interactive web-response system. The allocation sequence was unstratified and used a 1:1 ratio with a blocking schema and block sizes of six. Patients were randomly assigned to receive orally administered colchicine (0·5 mg twice per day for 3 days and then once per day for 27 days thereafter) or matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of death or hospital admission for COVID-19. Vital status at the end of the study was available for 97·9% of patients. The analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The COLCORONA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04322682) and is now closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Trial enrolment began in March 23, 2020, and was completed in Dec 22, 2020. A total of 4488 patients (53·9% women; median age 54·0 years, IQR 47·0-61·0) were enrolled and 2235 patients were randomly assigned to colchicine and 2253 to placebo. The primary endpoint occurred in 104 (4·7%) of 2235 patients in the colchicine group and 131 (5·8%) of 2253 patients in the placebo group (odds ratio [OR] 0·79, 95·1% CI 0·61-1·03; p=0·081). Among the 4159 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, the primary endpoint occurred in 96 (4·6%) of 2075 patients in the colchicine group and 126 (6·0%) of 2084 patients in the placebo group (OR 0·75, 0·57-0·99; p=0·042). Serious adverse events were reported in 108 (4·9%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 139 (6·3%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p=0·051); pneumonia occurred in 63 (2·9%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 92 (4·1%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p=0·021). Diarrhoea was reported in 300 (13·7%) of 2195 patients in the colchicine group and 161 (7·3%) of 2217 patients in the placebo group (p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: In community-treated patients including those without a mandatory diagnostic test, the effect of colchicine on COVID-19-related clinical events was not statistically significant. Among patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, colchicine led to a lower rate of the composite of death or hospital admission than placebo. Given the absence of orally administered therapies to prevent COVID-19 complications in community-treated patients and the benefit of colchicine in patients with PCR-proven COVID-19, this safe and inexpensive anti-inflammatory agent could be considered for use in those at risk of complications. Notwithstanding these considerations, replication in other studies of PCR-positive community-treated patients is recommended. FUNDING: The Government of Quebec, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the US National Institutes of Health, the Montreal Heart Institute Foundation, the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, the Rudin Family Foundation, and philanthropist Sophie Desmarais.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Colchicina , Administração Oral , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Colchicina/administração & dosagem , Colchicina/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação
8.
Can Commun Dis Rep ; 47(4): 209-215, 2021 May 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34035667

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Canadian Paediatric Society no longer recommends the use of universal ocular prophylaxis with erythromycin ointment to prevent ophthalmia neonatorum. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in all pregnant women is considered the most effective way of preventing vertical transmission and ophthalmia neonatorum. OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to assess prenatal screening rates of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae and to compare sociodemographic factors between those screened and those not screened. METHODS: The list of all women who delivered at a tertiary care hospital in Montréal, Québec, between April 2015 and March 2016, was cross-referenced with the list of samples tested for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae. Maternal medical records were reviewed for demographic, prenatal and diagnostic information. RESULTS: Of 2,688 mothers, 2,245 women were screened at least once, but only 2,206 women had at least one valid C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae result the day of delivery (82.1%; 95% CI: 80.6%-83.5%). Infection was detected in 46/2,206 (2.1%) screened women: 42 had C. trachomatis infection, two had N. gonorrhoeae infection and two were co-infected. C. trachomatis infection was more frequent in women younger than 25 years (9.8%; 95% CI: 6.7%-13.8%) than in older women (0.8%; 95% CI: 0.4%-1.3%; p<0.001). Each increase in parity decreased the probability of being tested (adjusted odds ratio=0.89; 95% CI: 0.80%-0.97%; p=0.01). Of those with an initial negative test result, 35/267 (13.1%; 95% CI: 9.3%-17.8%) of women younger than 25 years and 122/1,863 (6.6%; 95% CI: 5.5%-7.8%; p<0.001) of women aged 25 years and older were retested. Subsequent infection was detected in 4/35 (11%) women, all younger than 25. CONCLUSION: Suboptimal screening rates for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae suggest that current universal ocular prophylaxis cannot be discontinued. Repeating universal screening should be considered, especially among those younger than 25 years.

9.
J Med Virol ; 93(9): 5333-5338, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33851739

RESUMO

The accurate laboratory detection of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a crucial element in the fight against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing on combined oral and nasopharyngeal swab (ONPS) suffers from several limitations, including the need for qualified personnel, the discomfort caused by invasive nasopharyngeal sample collection, and the possibility of swab and transport media shortage. Testing on saliva would represent an advancement. The aim of this study was to compare the concordance between saliva samples and ONPS for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 on various commercial and laboratory-developed tests (LDT). Individuals were recruited from eight institutions in Quebec, Canada, if they had SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected on a recently collected ONPS, and accepted to provide another ONPS, paired with saliva. Assays available in the different laboratories (Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2, Cobas® SARS-CoV-2, Simplexa™ COVID-19 Direct, Allplex™ 2019-nCoV, RIDA®GENE SARS-CoV-2, and an LDT preceded by three different extraction methods) were used to determine the concordance between saliva and ONPS results. Overall, 320 tests were run from a total of 125 saliva and ONPS sample pairs. All assays yielded similar sensitivity when saliva was compared to ONPS, with the exception of one LDT (67% vs. 93%). The mean difference in cycle threshold (∆C t ) was generally (but not significantly) in favor of the ONPS for all nucleic acid amplification tests. The maximum mean ∆​​​​​C t was 2.0, while individual ∆C t varied importantly from -17.5 to 12.4. Saliva seems to be associated with sensitivity similar to ONPS for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by various assays.


Assuntos
Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/normas , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/normas , RNA Viral/genética , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/virologia , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/instrumentação , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/instrumentação , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Humanos , Boca/virologia , Nasofaringe/virologia , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Saliva/virologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Manejo de Espécimes/normas
10.
Access Microbiol ; 2(5): acmi000116, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32974579

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The correlation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) between agar dilution and gradient diffusion for Neisseria gonorrhoeae is not well established, especially in strains with high MICs. AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of gradient diffusion for N. gonorrhoeae . METHODS: Fifty strains of N. gonorrhoeae , all tested by the agar dilution method according to CLSI methods and confirmed to be genetically distinct using molecular typing (NG-MAST), were selected. Isolates with high MICs were targeted. Gradient diffusion was performed for ceftriaxone (CRO), cefixime (CFX), azithromycin (AZT), tetracycline (TET) and fosfomycin (FOS) using two different commercial antimicrobial strips on different culture media (a non-commercial GC agar base with 1 % defined growth supplement and two commercial media). The performance of agar gradient diffusion was assessed based on accuracy, using essential and category agreements (EA and CA). RESULTS: Essential and categorical agreement were over 90 % for CRO, CFX and AZT on the two commercial agar media tested. Category disagreements were seen for CFX and AZT, mostly just very major errors. For TET, EA ranged from 80 to 96 % and CA ranged from 38 to 76 %, most of the misclassifications being minor errors. Finally, EA for FOS ranged between 80 and 98 %. CONCLUSION: Gradient diffusion is an accurate and acceptable alternative for CRO, CFX and AZT. Caution is advised when MICs are reported by gradient diffusion approach breakpoints because of the possibility of very major errors. The use of gradient diffusion is limited for TET because of the high rate of minor errors.

11.
CMAJ ; 191(36): E981-E988, 2019 Sep 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31501180

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health care-associated infections are a common cause of patient morbidity and mortality. We sought to describe the trends in these infections in acute care hospitals, using data from 3 national point-prevalence surveys. METHODS: The Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP) conducted descriptive point-prevalence surveys to assess the burden of health care-associated infections on a single day in February of 2002, 2009 and 2017. Surveyed infections included urinary tract infection, pneumonia, Clostridioides difficile infection, infection at surgical sites and bloodstream infections. We compared the prevalence of infection across the survey years and considered the contribution of antimicrobial-resistant organisms as a cause of these infections. RESULTS: We surveyed 28 of 33 (response rate 84.8%) CNISP hospitals (6747 patients) in 2002, 39 of 55 (response rate 71.0%) hospitals (8902 patients) in 2009 and 47 of 66 (response rate 71.2%) hospitals (9929 patients) in 2017. The prevalence of patients with at least 1 health care-associated infection increased from 9.9% in 2002 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.4%-11.5%) to 11.3% in 2009 (95% CI 9.4%-13.5%), and then declined to 7.9% in 2017 (95% CI 6.8%-9.0%). In 2017, device-associated infections accounted for 35.6% of all health care-associated infections. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) accounted for 3.9% of all organisms identified from 2002 to 2017; other antibiotic-resistant organisms were uncommon causes of infection for all survey years. INTERPRETATION: In CNISP hospitals, there was a decline in the prevalence of health care-associated infection in 2017 compared with previous surveys. However, strategies to prevent infections associated with medical devices should be developed. Apart from MRSA, few infections were caused by antibiotic-resistant organisms.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Controle de Infecções , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/patogenicidade , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiologia , Criança , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Controle de Infecções/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vigilância da População , Prevalência , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle
12.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 6(4): ofz088, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30949534

RESUMO

Mycobacterium africanum is an important cause of human tuberculosis and is found almost exclusively in West Africa. We identified a cluster of patients in Montreal, Canada, with M africanum disease that share identical genotypic signatures by mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number tandem repeat (MIRU-VNTR) typing and a putative epidemiological link, thus providing evidence of possible local transmission of M africanum in Montreal over a 10-year period.

13.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 74(2): 315-320, 2019 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30312401

RESUMO

Objectives: Globally there is an increased prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. (CRAs) and carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter spp. (CPAs) in the hospital setting. This increase prompted the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP) to conduct surveillance of CRA colonizations and infections identified from patients in CNISP-participating hospitals between 2010 and 2016. Methods: Participating acute care facilities across Canada submitted CRAs from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2016. Patient data were collected from medical records using a standardized questionnaire. WGS was conducted on all CRAs and data underwent single nucleotide variant analysis, resistance gene detection and MLST. Results: The 7 year incidence rate of CRA was 0.02 per 10 000 patient days and 0.015 per 1000 admissions, with no significant increase observed over the surveillance period (P > 0.73). Ninety-four CRA isolates were collected from 58 hospitals, of which 93 (98.9%) were CPA. Carbapenemase OXA-235 group (48.4%) was the most common due to two separate clusters, followed by the OXA-23 group (41.9%). Patients with a travel history were associated with 38.8% of CRA cases. The all-cause 30 day mortality rate for infected cases was 24.4 per 100 CRA cases. Colistin was the most active antimicrobial agent (95.8% susceptibility). Conclusions: CRA remains uncommon in Canadian hospitals and the incidence did not increase from 2010 to 2016. Almost half of the cases were from two clusters harbouring OXA-235-group enzymes. Previous medical treatment during travel outside of Canada was common.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolamento & purificação , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/enzimologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Canadá/epidemiologia , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , beta-Lactamases/genética
14.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 93(2): 136-139, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30293678

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In an era of rising healthcare expenditures, it is critical to find ways to decrease cost. The objective of this study is to evaluate the number of repeated tests and the associated cost savings in a university-affiliated hospital. METHODS: The following 7 microbiology analysis were assessed for nonrepeat testing: HCV antibody, HBV core antibody, CMV IgG, rubella IgG, Treponema pallidum antibodies, Clostridioides difficile toxin detection, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci PCR. Presence of a prior positive result leads to the cancellation of subsequent orders. RESULTS: Percentages of not repeated test ranged from 0.1% to 21.4%. Rubella IgG had the highest proportion of unnecessary repeat testing. Total cost savings were estimated at $33,627 for 2016. CONCLUSION: Unnecessary repeated microbiologic test can account for a non-negligible part of total volume test. Use of an automated software to detect unnecessary repeated microbiologic test through laboratory information system can generate important savings.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Informação em Laboratório Clínico/economia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/economia , Redução de Custos/economia , Procedimentos Desnecessários/economia , Sistemas de Informação em Laboratório Clínico/estatística & dados numéricos , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/estatística & dados numéricos , Redução de Custos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos
15.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 19(1)2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27943498

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a significant complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Our primary objective was to determine risk factors for the development of CDI during the first year following allo-HSCT. METHODS: A matched case-control study nested in a cohort of allo-HSCT at a single hospital in Montréal, Québec, Canada, was conducted from 2002 through 2011. RESULTS: Sixty-five of 760 patients who underwent allo-HSCT between 2002 and 2011 developed CDI, representing an incidence of 8.6%. We selected 123 controls matched for year of transplant for risk factor analyses. In the multivariable analysis, receipt of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prior to transplantation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.27), mucositis (aOR 5.90, 95% CI 2.08-16.72), and reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) (aOR 6.17, 95% CI 2.17-17.57) and of other Herpesviridae viruses (aOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.13-8.16) were the variables that remained statistically associated with CDI. High-risk antibiotic use in the late post-transplant period (aOR 7.63, 95% CI 2.14-27.22) was associated with development of late CDI. CONCLUSION: This study revealed reactivation of CMV and other Herpesviridae viruses as novel risk factors for CDI. Administration of TMP-SMX prior to transplantation was independently associated with a decreased risk of CDI. Early and late CDI after HSCT may have distinct risk factors.


Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/complicações , Citomegalovirus/fisiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Ativação Viral , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções por Clostridium/complicações , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Citomegalovirus/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/virologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosite/complicações , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Transplante Homólogo/efeitos adversos , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/administração & dosagem , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico
16.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 3(3): ofw158, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27704013

RESUMO

Anncaliia algerae myositis is a life-threatening, emerging microsporidiosis among immunocompromised hosts. We report a case of disseminated A algerae infection in a man previously treated with alemtuzumab. Due to failure of albendazole-based therapy, fumagillin was added as a novel approach to management, with a good clinical response and patient survival.

17.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 71(12): 3562-3567, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27494927

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Empirical treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women should be based on local susceptibility data. We aimed to generate regional and provincial cumulative antibiograms combining data from different laboratory information systems and determine the impact of basic patient characteristics on susceptibility results. METHODS: All positive urine samples for Escherichia coli obtained from women aged 18-65 years old in outpatient settings between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2015 from four hospitals in Quebec, Canada, were included. The cumulative antibiogram for ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was calculated. A clinically significant difference in susceptibility profile was defined as factor(s) that lowered the susceptibility proportion below 80%. RESULTS: A total of 36 293 positive urine cultures were analysed. In the last year of the study, the proportion of susceptibility for ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was 90.3%, 95.4% and 81.9%, respectively. The susceptibility proportion was <80% for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the Montreal region (73.4%; 95% CI 71.1%-75.9%), whereas it remained >80% for the other regions. A significant decrease in susceptibility with time was identified for ciprofloxacin (92.1%-90.3%, P < 0.001) and nitrofurantoin (97.1%-95.4%, P < 0.001). Increasing age, recent hospitalization and site of collection were associated with an increase in resistance for certain antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, all first-line antimicrobials remain acceptable choices for empirical treatment of uncomplicated UTIs in women in Quebec. The regional variability in susceptibility data within a single province emphasizes the importance of local susceptibility data to inform the development of empirical treatment guidelines for UTIs.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/farmacologia , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrofurantoína/farmacologia , Nitrofurantoína/uso terapêutico , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/farmacologia , Combinação Trimetoprima e Sulfametoxazol/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Urina/microbiologia , Adulto Jovem
18.
Pharmacotherapy ; 35(6): 600-7, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26095008

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of piperacillin-tazobactam administered as a 4-hour infusion in critically ill patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). DESIGN: Prospective, observational, pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Montréal, Canada. PATIENTS: Twenty critically ill adults who were undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration and receiving a 4-hour infusion of piperacillin 4 g-tazobactam 0.5 g every 8 hours for a documented or suspected infection. INTERVENTION: Blood samples were collected every hour over an 8-hour dosing interval. Prefilter and postfilter blood samples, and effluent and urine samples were also collected. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved an unbound piperacillin plasma concentration above a target minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 64 mg/L (MIC that inhibits 90% of isolates for Pseudomonas aeruginosa) for at least 50% of the dosing interval; 18 (90%) of the 20 patients achieved this outcome. In all patients, the free piperacillin concentrations were above the Pseudomonas aeruginosa breakpoint of 16 mg/L for the entire time interval. Regarding piperacillin pharmacokinetic parameters, the median (interquartile range) minimum unbound plasma concentration was 65.15 mg/L (51.30-89.30), maximum unbound plasma concentration was 141.3 mg/L (116.75-173.90), sieving coefficient was 0.809 (0.738-0.938), total clearance was 65.82 ml/minute (53.79-102.87), and renal clearance was 0.16 ml/minute (0.05-3.04). The median CRRT dose was 32.0 ml/kg/h (25.0-39.8). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a 4-hour infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam was associated with a favorable pharmacodynamic profile in patients undergoing CRRT. Concentrations associated with maximal activity were attained in our patients.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Hemodiafiltração , Ácido Penicilânico/análogos & derivados , Idoso , Estado Terminal , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ácido Penicilânico/farmacocinética , Piperacilina/farmacocinética , Combinação Piperacilina e Tazobactam , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções por Pseudomonas/prevenção & controle , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...